Skip to main content

Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis




Just finished reading an interesting study that was a meta-analysis of digital versus paper reading. The research done by Virginia Clinton (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9817.12269) concluded with:

Reading from screens, such as tablets, smartphones and computers, has become ubiquitous for leisure, academic and work‐related reading. This review examined the literature on performance and two processes in reading text from screens and paper. There is legitimate concern that reading on paper may be better in terms of performance and efficiency. Future examination of key issues related to mind wandering, medium preference and contextual cues provided by medium will inform the practical implications of reading text from paper compared to screens.

The study is well done and I wouldn't have any issues with her conclusions. Her study looked at 33 high-quality studies that tested students’ comprehension after they were randomly assigned to read on a screen or on paper.  According to the study, the benefit for reading on paper was rather small, with 29 of the 33 laboratory studies found that readers learned more from text on paper. The study also identifies that the reading genre also makes a difference, the studies that had students read narrative fiction, found there was no benefit to paper over screens.

She also points out some of the issues of such studies. Such as how age is an important factor. Because adults have had more experience with reading (and for them, much of it would have been limited to paper). Today though, it has become more common for elementary school students to read from screens. So it is likely that readers who are children today may be more accustomed to reading from screens and readers who are adults likely learned how to read from paper. This makes me wonder how much of this is an experience effect. Also with that experience would be the devices. Other than her mentioning them being on screens and being studies after 2008, there was no differentiation of the analysis that I could find about the different kinds of screens, especially important for light-emitting versus the modern eink devices, like a Kindle. Additionally, she was using studies that didn't have participants with disabilities, including visual impairments, which is quite reasonable to avoid possible confounds related to disabilities.

I'm not surprised to find that there is some difference, or that it may be more for print - printed paper is a great technology with a long history. The study is a good one. But the issue that could develop are such a comparison of something that do one thing versus a variety of things. Consider, if you had to compare a rowboat and a powerboat, but you could only compare them by rowing. I've seen amazing changes in the reading experience by some of my students just by a minor increase in font size. Although, for those reading from lighted screens you have to worry also about the light effect and the distractions of other apps that might be one. Everything has advantages and disadvantages. We also need studies not to just combine all devices into one category, reading from a computer (screen just ahead), would be different from a tablet (down at an angle like a book), as could be the led screen versus the eink. More studies such as this one are needed. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Auto Summarization

In dealing with textbooks and students with disabilities, one of the most common things that we would do is to get the textbook in a digital format, as an ebook. By doing this we were able to use a number of tools based on the need of the student. I've had students who could not lift their physical printed textbook, but would be able to access though a laptop installed in their electronic wheelchair, for students with vision issues we could boost the font size or use a text-to-speech tool to have the book read aloud to them. One tool that I used with a number of my students who had issues was the Auto Summarize tool in Word. The tool works well with textbook, but wouldn't work for other texts, such as novels.  I used this to reduce the amount of text that they had to read, the "cognitive load" of the text, but would still enable be able to get the information. Word did a great job, and depending on the student I would reduce the text to about 66% for facts and support...

Ebooks as Textbooks - Part 2 - Highlighting

Highlighting can be a very effective tool in reading and learning no matter the kind of text being read: from novels to textbooks. Most textbooks or other forms of information text will usually used text features along with graphics to help organize information presented in the text.  These elements are done to help focus attention on important or key concepts and provide additional information. The text organization itself can include structural elements such as heading, subheading, index, glossary, paragraph spacing, bulleted or numbered lists, sidebars or side boxes, italics, underlines or bold for words or even sections. Graphic content can include the use of symbols, colors, illustrations, pictures, diagrams, charts, and graphs. Poor highlighting design - too much text has been highlighted.  The act of highlighting is less time consuming and much easier than note-taking ( to be discussed in an upcoming posting). To be ...

Ebooks as Textbooks Part 8: Textbook structure

Textbooks usually have a structure, and it doesn't matter if it is an electronic textbook or a paper printed one, the people who put the textbook together usually make it have a structure to help you better understand what you are reading and learning. Textbooks are usually a type of text known as informational or expository text - this is text written to inform, and can be things like textbook chapters, newspaper and magazine articles, and other reference materials like encyclopedia items. The other kind of text that you usually encounter in school is narrative text, where a story is being told - which could be fictional or non-fiction. And while textbooks are informational text, many will also have narrative text, usually as stories to help you better understand the concept, although in an English or literature class the stories are often more the focus of the learning. Textbook Elements With an electronic textbook it might be hard to see the structure, because you cant riffle...